AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition crams 208MB of cache into a single chip

278 points - today at 2:17 AM

Source

Comments

magicalhippo today at 4:20 AM
Probably fun for those who already bought DDR5 memory... still kicking myself for not just pulling the trigger on that 128GB dual stick kit I looked at for $600 back in September. Now it's listed at $4k...

Meanwhile I hope my AM4 will chug along a few more years.

chao- today at 3:32 AM
Crazy to think that my first personal computer's entire storage (was 160MB IIRC?) could fit into the L3 of a single consumer CPU!

It's probably not possible architecturally, but it would be amusing to see an entire early 90's OS running entirely in the CPU's cache.

senfiaj today at 1:02 PM
Back in 2004 my PC RAM was 256. My relative's laptop had 128. That's crazy when a modern CPU cache can theoretically host an OS (or even multiple OSes) from early 2000s.
SubiculumCode today at 6:31 PM
Oh man. I am running computations on my server that involve computing geodesic distances with the heat method. The job turns out to be a L3 cache thrasher, leaving my cpus underutilized for multi worker jobs .... 208mb instead of my 25 per socket sounds amazing
monster_truck today at 4:47 AM
The extra cache doesn't do a damn thing (maybe +2%)

The lower leakage currents at lower voltages allowed them to implement a far more aggressive clock curve from the factory. That's where the higher allcore clock comes from (+30W TDP)

I'm not complaining at all, I think this is an excellent way to leverage binning to sell leftover cache.

Though if I may complain, Ars used to actually write about such things in their articles instead of speculate in a way that suspiciously resembles what an AI would write.

MaximilianEmel today at 7:35 PM
They should allow it to function without any external RAM.
nexle today at 4:02 AM
Breakdown of the (semi-clickbait) 208MB cache: 16MB L2 (8MB per die?) + 32MB L3 * 2 dies + 64MB L3 Stacked 3D V-cache * 2

For comparison, 9950X3D have a total cache of 144MB.

rietta today at 4:47 PM
I am so grateful that I bought my 128 GB ram kit in January of last year for my own 9950 upgrade. We just built my dad a 7000 series to replace his old AM4 (2017 build) and 32 gigs DDR five was nearly the same price at Micro Center that I paid last year. I was able to gift him an Nvidia 1060 discreet graphics card so that he could continue to run his two monitors. The newer motherboards have much less on board capability for that.
pwr22 today at 11:04 AM
I'm interested to know if the L3 cache all behaves as a single pool for any core on either CCD, whether there's a penalty in access time depending on locality or whether they are just entirely localised.
electronsoup today at 5:44 PM
Whenever I see a chip like this, I think "why wont my company let me use a decent computer"
2001zhaozhao today at 8:20 AM
I don't really see a huge reason to buy this other than it being a top-tier halo product.

For gaming, AMD already pins the game threads to the CCD with the extra cache pretty well.

For multi-threaded workloads the gain from having cache on both CCDs is quite small.

erulabs today at 4:48 AM
9950X3D2? AMD, who is making you name your products like this? At some point just give up and name the chip a UUID already.
Readerium today at 3:17 AM
Can someone explain if the 3D Vcache are stacked on top of each other or side by side.

If they are stacked then why not 9800X3D2?

Jotalea today at 5:10 PM
so you're telling me I can (theoretically) have a full Alpine Linux installation in just the CPU? I'm impressed
fc417fc802 today at 4:27 AM
Given that the dies still have L3 on them does this count as L4 or does the hardware treat it as a single pool of L3?

Would be neat to have an additional cache layer of ~1 GB of HBM on the package but I guess there's no way that happens in the consumer space any time soon.

varispeed today at 5:38 PM
I know the prices of RAM are high, but 256GB RAM limit seems like omission. If they supported at least 512GB in quad or eight channel that would be something worth looking at for me. I know there is Threadripper but ECC memory is out of reach.
jaimex2 today at 6:46 AM
Can someone like... boot Windows 98 on these on a system with no ram?!
tw1984 today at 5:44 AM
that is larger than the HDD of my first PC.
DeathArrow today at 7:47 AM
My first computer had 64KB of RAM. My first PC had 8MB of RAM.
swarnie today at 12:18 PM
Factorio mega basing just found a new ceiling.
renewiltord today at 3:43 AM
I have a gigabyte of cache on my 9684x at home!
sylware today at 9:46 AM
With the best silicon tech, in R&D, what would be the maxium static RAM(L1 cache) you could really slap to a 8 core CPU? (Zero DRAM).
throwaway85825 today at 5:01 AM
It's disappointing that they had this for years but didn't release it until now.
jeremie_strand today at 3:01 PM
[dead]
jeremie_strand today at 1:23 PM
[dead]
qmr today at 3:39 AM
[flagged]