I'm puzzled by Espressif's naming here. We had the ESP32-S3, so "S31" sounds like "S3, variant 1," but this part doesn't really look like a simple S3 variant. And then there's an ESP32-E22, but no E21 or even a plain E2 anywhere.
They claim that the chip has an "MMU". But unfortunately this doesn't seem to be a true RISC-V MMU (according to the Sv32 specification) integrated into the CPU core itself, but just a peripheral designed for memory mapped SPI flash and PSRAM. So as far as I understand there is no true process isolation with page faults and dynamic paging.
madushan1000today at 3:28 PM
Interesting that they made a new chip with BLE+BR/EDR again. all the chips after the original ESP32 were BLE only.
Hope this chip has good low power options so we can use it in Bluetooth audio workloads.
moepstartoday at 9:02 AM
I believe this is the first ESP to gain Ethernet capability?
I totally wish that a board would come with PoE…
Because as it is right now, powering a fleet of those with USB power supplies is annoying as fsck…
elevationtoday at 7:19 PM
Are there any US vendors with wifi/BLE-integrated MCUs -- a single package that does it all?
vlan0today at 3:16 PM
I don't understand what possesses these folks to continue making 2.4ghz devices. I understand there are use cases for low bandwidth, high range. But surely we've passed the point where that is more desirable to most than lower latency and high throughput, right?
urba_today at 10:32 AM
I don’t trust Espressif’s releases, I am still waiting for ESP32-P4 to hit distributors.
It is now more than 2 years and 3rd chip revision
ivanjermakovtoday at 12:54 PM
HN title entropy record?
nirav72today at 1:41 PM
Argh…Wifi 6 , but 2.4ghz.
peterustoday at 3:50 PM
It would be good if this chip had good idle current comparable to other MCUs. I have used the ESP32S3 and it's idle current with the radio enabled, but not transmitting, is quite terrible.
My application needed both can bus and Bluetooth (though no wifi) so the S3 was one of the only options available. I'm sure the high current draw is because the wifi and ble share the same radio?
bdavbdavtoday at 1:11 PM
Love ESP boards, and with Raspberry pi pricing though the roof, I’m hoping more will discover the love of getting the job done on a 10mm2 package.
I suspect a lot of the things people are using RPi for are better served by things like this (and virtualisation for the heavier end)
sgraztoday at 6:12 PM
Pardon for off topic. The designer in me hates that they used AI for every single asset in this release post, looks so amateurish.
ricardobeattoday at 9:58 AM
I hope this one has multiple radios so you can actually use BT/Wifi/Thread simultaneously.
jxm262today at 5:04 PM
Perfect timing. I just started planning to build a DIY smartwatch and was looking into the S3. Having native zigbee support could be nice.
MrBuddyCasinotoday at 10:53 AM
> high-speed 250 MHz 8-bit DDR PSRAM with concurrent flash and PSRAM access
This is perhaps lost in the noise but IMO a large deal. PSRAM starting to get serious bandwidth.
Mashimotoday at 11:48 AM
Oh neat. Zigbee support.
I wonder if I at some point can create low power devices with EspHome for home assistant. I assume this should use less power than connecting to wifi?
volemotoday at 10:26 AM
How do Espressif’s RISC-V cores compare to existing ARM or RISC-V options in terms of power efficiency (computational power / electrical power)?
kunvertoday at 12:38 PM
Soon espressif will add TPU to their chips.
bestoufftoday at 8:41 AM
Is there something that match those elsewhere ?
logicalleetoday at 9:15 AM
Roughly how much do you think this costs?
ameliustoday at 10:40 AM
Does it run Linux?
burnt-resistortoday at 12:41 PM
Interesting.
Although, I'd like to seem some non-paid blogger head-to-head reviews benchmarking instruction cycle efficiency per power of comparable Arm vs. ESP32 Xtensa LX6* and RISC-V parts.
* Metric crap tons of WROOM parts are still available and ancient ESP8266 probably too.
wosinedtoday at 9:22 AM
The ESP32 boards I own have bad support and are a bit of a hit and miss. (arduino nano esp32) Did this get better? Or is the support still messy?
anymouse123456today at 11:18 AM
Since the Snowden leaks in 2013, it just doesn't make sense that *any* foreign customers would put US technology inside their firewall. But they do.
It shocks me even more that any Western customer would do the same with network-connected Chinese chips. But we do.
The Espressif chips are truly incredible value, but what are we doing here?
Is there any doubt that these don't represent a major attack surface if a conflict were to heat up?
If you had network-connected chips of your own design inside every household of your adversary, what could you do with that?