The problem with models like this is they're built on very little actual training data we can trace back to verifiable protein data. The protein data back, and other sources of training data for stuff like this, has a lot of broken structures in them and "creative liberties" taken to infer a structure from instrument data. It's a very complex process that leaves a lot for interpretation.

On top of that, we don't have a clear understanding on how certain positions (conformations) of a structure affect underlying biological mechanisms.

Yes, these models can predict surprisingly accurate structures and sequences. Do we know if these outputs are biologically useful? Not quite.

This technology is amazing, don't get me wrong, but to the average person they might see this and wonder why we can't go full futurism and solve every pathology with models like these.

We've come a long way, but there's still a very very long way to go.

full article: https://huggingface.co/blog/OpenMed/training-mrna-models-25-...

HN's blindspots never cease to amaze me.

I am a structural biologist working in pharmaceutical design and this type of thing could be wildly useful (if it works).

Can someone explain what one might use this model for? As a developer with a casual interest in biology it would be fun to play with but honestly not sure what I would do

> In Progress: CodonJEPA

JEPA is going to break the whole industry :D

What makes these Domain specific models work when we don’t have good domain models for health care, chemistry, economics and so on

Distributing the load on this will probably be infinitely more useful than “folding at home”

gray goo of the future

hmmmm seems like some fake hype.