Artemis II will use laser beams to live-stream 4K moon footage at 260 Mbps

274 points - today at 3:04 PM

Source

Comments

xattt today at 3:37 PM
Hopefully, the footage is better than the missed pan up at lift-off, and showing spectators at the time of booster separation.

I understand funding cuts and all, but this is a once-in-a-generation moment and it’s filmed with no apparent effort whatsoever.

SoftTalker today at 3:41 PM
> never-before-seen views of “the far side of the Moon“

I guess not counting all the prior "views" that have been recorded since the Apollo missions, including Chinese orbiters which (according to Wikipedia) "scanned the entire Moon in unprecedented detail, generating a high definition 3D map that would provide a reference for future soft landings"

bnchrch today at 3:46 PM
This in particular warmed my grumpy heart after the best footage of the launch came from a commercial airliners windows.

I had assumed they would've had a better plan to film the entire departure from orbit yesterday.

I'm at least happy they have one for the loop around the moon.

vibe42 today at 3:42 PM
NASA's rendering of the flyby:

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a005500/a005536/a2_fly...

Hope we get to see something like this in 4K !

saltybytes today at 5:45 PM
Forgive my bluntness asking this question: how hard can it be to put a stationary "satellite" as a communication relay next to the moon to bridge the "dark window" with the space craft?
1970-01-01 today at 7:55 PM
The Alan Parsons Project is going 4K?
Cider9986 today at 5:12 PM
> "will use laser beams to live-stream 4K moon footage at 260 Mbps..."

> "will be used to beam 4K moon footage at up to 260 Mbps."

> "Data rates of 260 Mbps can be achieved..."

I wonder what size stream will be available to us. The largest I see in general is 70-90 Mbps for a 4k Bluray Remux and that includes lossless audio. I imagine they would want as much data as possible—significantly more than would be visible to the human eye.

Gagarin1917 today at 4:25 PM
Why does the article keep mentioning footage “from the surface of the moon”?
runnr_az today at 7:35 PM
How accurate does the laser have to be to hit the base station?
egberts1 today at 6:34 PM
Still want to know what happened in first 10 second of launch, why were the videos fuzzy and cutting out (at least twice)????
jascenso today at 5:27 PM
260 Mbps for 4K seems to be awfully a lot for a single stream. Really makes me wonder what has been used for compression ...
deleted today at 4:37 PM
deleted today at 4:25 PM
yardie today at 4:07 PM
A reminder that the illegal DOGE took a chainsaw to NASA personnel last year. If you're disappointed that the feed update wasn't as polished as a SpaceX launch it's because the later has an actual communications and marketing department with a budget.
danny_codes today at 5:45 PM
Hopefully it’s not cloudy
brcmthrowaway today at 3:52 PM
How does laser communication work with a moving object with 9DoF?!
ck2 today at 5:42 PM
Didn't Nokia put a 4G cell node up there?

Who is going to be the first to make a smartphone call from the moon?

Lag won't be too bad, just 1.5 seconds or less

ethanmacavoy today at 5:24 PM
the writeup is helpful but i'd want to see how it handles edge cases
chmorgan_ today at 5:52 PM
[dead]
scottburgess33 today at 5:51 PM
[dead]