This begs the question, who is paying for it?

[dead]

[flagged]

>Hey, at least in Mexico surveillance tech people might wake up to their family chopped to pieces. One can hope, anyway.

I don't think this is a good thing. The crime is detrimental to innocent people, and although mass surveillance should not be the answer, it can only be fought through democratic processes.

I am curious what Mexico should do long term to reduce crime. The U.S. used to have a bigger problem with organized crime, but it has been subdued before mass surveillance was an option.