I've been using it extensively since the release and the best summary I can give is that it's good enough to use it for (almost) everything and cheap enough that the cost are irrelevant. I'm running it in Oh My Pi with a second instance running as "advisor" and even with 5-6 active sessions (effectively 12 streams) I'm struggling to spend more than 5 bucks per day.

OpenCode Go even has double limits temporarily so for 10 USD you effectively get 140 USD of tokens to spend. It would impress me if someone could burn that amount with "normal" usage. Even when running multiple sessions.

I have a Claude Max subscription but I've barely touched it, it just feels like a step back to have to think about limits and usage even though the models are stronger.

The beauty of intelligence at this cost (even if it's not SOTA) is that it opens a whole bunch of new use cases. Test failure in CI? Have the bot automatically propose a fix, its cheap enough that you can discard it w/h issues. Test coverage too low? Auto generate tests on CI for every pull-requests! Monitoring server logs, continuous security audits and investigating every received exception now becomes possible.

I'm thinking about having it automatically filter and re-rank my social media feeds so I can steer the algorithm instead of the other way around.

Perhaps other people (with enormous budgets) were already doing all of the above but for us this is a really exciting release!

Note this is the 07/31 release of DSv4 flash and not the "preview" that they put out a couple months or so ago.

I've been running this model locally for a week, and the preview version before that. This updated one feels like a whole tier up. It's very capable for debugging and analyzing documents/data I upload.

The killer feature, IMO, is the speed. On 2x RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell, its ~8k tok/s prefill and ~250 tok/s on a single stream. I saw 1000 tok/s with ~64 concurrent streams on vLLM.

That's fast enough that you can interactively chat with it without switching tabs while you wait, and its a ~300B (13B active, hence the speed) model so the responses are also very good. It's actually more convenient now for me to direct 95%+ of my day to day usage to my local model, and only use Claude Fable for really big coding tasks.

Until this model was released, I was contemplating spending even more money on hardware to run GLM5.2 (~750B) at reasonable speeds, but I no longer feel that need. This is smart enough, and I think it only gets much better for local models from here.

My Claude account was banned the other day. The only possible cause I can think of is that I tried to authenticate from the AI assistant in a JetBrains IDE and, not thinking, entered the details for my regular subscription rather than an API account. As soon as it became apparent that I needed an API account rather than a subscription, I just closed out of the tab. Nevertheless, about 20 minutes later I got an email saying my account was banned for a violation of the usage policy, and my appeal was rejected.

My initial thought was to sign up for ChatGPT, but I had $20 in OpenRouter so I've been trying out DeepSeek V4 Pro with Pi for the last few days and I gotta say, it's good enough for my use case. And even with paying for API usage rather than Claude's subsidised subscription, and with OpenRouter taking their cut, I will probably end up paying significantly less overall. And I really like the flexibility of being able to use whatever minimalist open source harness I want (and being able to switch providers easily, too).

(My demands probably aren't as high as many others' - I mostly use it for help with some hobbyist coding projects, and I tend to ask it questions about how to approach problems rather than just telling it to go off and code stuff for me.)

These are very interesting results, and honestly hard to believe, even as a big 0731 fan.

If I'm reading the chart correctly, a couple observations:

* deepseek-v4-flash-0731 max is better than kimi-k3 max

* glm-5.2 is dumber than a box of rocks (this must be on low reasoning or something, right?)

This is way more extreme than other results I'm seeing, like those from Artificial Analysis.

Compared to the last Deepseek V4 Flash version I've had tons of issues with it getting in infinite loops and talking to itself without executing tool calls, wasting tons of tokens

This is on Pi agent, nothing fancy at all about my prompts or use case. Anyone else experiencing this?

I've also had it randomly go from talking about Rust to talking about the electric chair, controversies about D&D rules (both irrelevant and something I've never discussed) and it's completely blind to it in future prompts even when its pointed out and referenced directly

All this said its still worth it but the agentic performance has degraded in my experience at least

DeepSeek has announced an upcoming "significant increase" in price, so this line may have to move to the right soon. https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing/

Kimi K3 was an interesting model only a month ago, and now we're looking at the same performance for 1/20th of the price. Wild how fast this is advancing.

I strongly recommend trying this for programming tasks.

It is strong (not Fable strong though) with a much better “persona” than Opus, and very different blindspots. If you flip between Claude and this you will find both catch the mistakes of the other before they get out of control.

On balance I actually prefer DeepSeek for programming now, because of the way it talks.

The recently announced they're raising their prices 10x right?

Which would put them... exactly where everyone else is on this graph.

Edit: I seem to have misunderstood the news. I thought the magical cache read pricing was going away (0.002) and they were going to be on par with everyone else (0.02). But I have no idea.

It's not frontier, but it's far past what we had at the beginning of the year. It's very usable. I get great instruction compliance, tool calling, and with a trivial workflows flow it has very good long-running performance as well.

Flash is a delightful model and the start of intelligence at effectively insignificant cost.

From here on, it's going to become all about harnesses that best situate and organize swarm intelligence at scale.

Last weeks's discussion (591 points): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49120299

Perhaps it might be interesting: a latent thinking version is here https://huggingface.co/nmitchko/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-Laten...

Does no thinking emissions for context saving.

DeepSeek is my cheap and cheerful Chinese model of choice for API use. Has been for a while, but now it's Flash instead of Pro. Even cheaper, and now better then Pro. I feel like most of the major Chinese models are benchmaxxed, they have weird quirks every time I use them (Qwen 3.8 Max doesn't check its work and leaves stuff broken, doesn't write tests unless prompted, etc., Kimi ends up being quite expensive and rarely better than GPT Sol or Opus 5), while DeepSeek models seem to be generally as good as the benchmarks indicate: Not the best, but stronger across the board than any model within an order of magnitude of its price.

Looking at the caching price of deepseek compared to its competitors, does it have a secret sauce or is it just subsidizing?

Should try it sometime

Oke of the great advantages of v4 flash 0731 is that even in the largest size unsloth quantized gguf, Q8 K XL, it will fit well within the resources of a 256GB DRAM server. If you have no gpu at all and are okay with setting up a workflow that handles slow token per second rate, give it a task and check back in 4-6 hours, it works great. And remember to give it more lengthy tasks to run overnight. Whatever workflow you set up, the idea is to keep it busy 24x7 doing different things in parallel.

This reminds me of those pareto-style speedrun record charts when a new glitch is discovered.

[0] https://taylor.town/silver-landmines

When I see dramatic leaps like this, it tells me that the important hacks haven't yet been discovered.

That page needs a Pareto frontier display. But wow, it absolutely demolishes.

wow. i remember when GPT-5.2 (medium) was everyone's favorite.

ARC-AGI II:

- GPT-5.2 (medium) %26.7 ($0.759)

- DSV4-Flash (max) %61.4 ($0.04)

I’ve been refreshing hacker news constantly for a week now waiting for v4 pro, after they stated it would follow «soon». I have learnt «soon» is a matter of definition.

It's always fun when Max reasoning is cheaper than High reasoning.

The benchmark performance tells me DeepSeek v4 Flash could be very cost-effective at playing SNES/Gameboy games.

I'm curious... is anyone using DeepSeek V4 Flash from HugginFace? Is the cost around the same as directly form DeepSeek or from Openrouter?

results comparable to gpt 5.6 luna but cheaper

promising!

Finally something that is breaking away from the pack. Interesting that max costs less than high. I still think, currently, TPS is more important than near frontier intelligence. Likely for reasons that LeCun outlined, maybe out of a billion prompts you will get value from that intelligence. When we have very fast models abstraction will work as that filter.

That's a pretty great score for a model you can run on as (expensive) laptop.

I'm really excited for where the open weight models go from here. I've had fun with just CPU inference on old servers that only have AVX1; here's hoping for commoditized TPU-like hardware!

I just used it for some Kubernetes + FluxCD tasks and oh my is it good.

I'm curious how much worse the 0731 quantizations do.

Been running it using Prime Agent and absolutely love it.

It is wild that this a log scale of cost to me!

Why wasn’t this run against ARC-AGI-3? Or did it fail to solve anything?

They did recently announce they're increasing prices though (got a mail yesterday I think), so not sure this analysis showing it as price outlier will last

Price raise incoming

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49198661

I love DeepSeek V4 Flash since the pre-0731, now even more. It is the first model that is truly too cheap to meter.

But I find it having a pretty significant problem with tool calling - no idea why, but tool calling with it is SLOW. As long as the model is reasoning, all good. But give it a bunch of tools and it becomes extremely slow.

Am I the only one experiencing this?

This latest DeepSeek is almost at the "too cheap to meter" level. That's going to be a larger unlock than models like Fable/Mythos that are way too expensive to justify, IMO.

What secret sauce do they have?

so cool. does it mean it can understand the verificated code

It's serviceable but, like many Chinese models, it uses a lot of tokens to get work done.

The DeepSeek team is so strong, very impressive.

Imagine if they had GPU resources of western labs.

[flagged]

Price is not a good meter. Active parameters per token are. Joule would be even better.

Price is confounded by VC subsidies, economies of scale, and inference optimizations. I think a more interesting chart would be ARC AGI vs forwards pass flops or ARC AGI vs training tokens. Of course we don't have those numbers for the closed source models or even some of the open weight ones.