Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

387 points - today at 12:58 PM

Source

Comments

internet2000 today at 2:36 PM
In case anyone here missed it, there's a native Ublock Origin for Safari. It works great → https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ublock-origin-lite/id674534269...
VCFundedGenYer today at 1:32 PM
Technically, Firefox Focus (a separate browser for iOS) includes an adblocker feature that can be applied system wide via iOS's content blockers subsystem. This was released in the late 2010s.

Firefox including it is likely just reducing the steps required.

ahmetozer today at 5:14 PM
temp0826 today at 1:35 PM
What's the current excuse for not supporting extensions on iOS? Orion on iOS does and it's the reason I dropped FF ages ago.
Shank today at 2:19 PM
> Ads shown on search engine results pages, including Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and other search providers

There are many subpar adblockers available both built into browsers on iOS and as extensions. uBlock Origin Lite for Safari remains the best mobile adblocker on iOS, I suppose.

nicce today at 7:06 PM
How is Firefox on iOS so fast compared to Safari or Orion? It is easily noticeable
michimagdesign today at 2:41 PM
Paying for Wipr 2 + Filtr is still the gold standard on apple platforms imo. But it’s not open source and there are no custom block lists.
rozman50 today at 5:40 PM
WIPR 2 is working great on Safari on iOS and MacOS. Worth the money https://apps.apple.com/si/app/wipr-2/id1662217862
HexDecOctBin today at 4:07 PM
So they still don't support the Content Blocker API? Wouldn't that have been easier? Then I could use whichever lists or providers (Adguard, uBlock, etc.) that I want.
Sha1rholder today at 4:54 PM
But advertising is the source of funding that many content creators rely on to make a living... Of course I don’t want Meta and Google profiting from mind-manipulating ads, but where is better business model? Crypto micropayments?
nikodunk today at 6:14 PM
Not available to me yet. I'll re-download and switch from Brave when it is.
petilon today at 4:45 PM
Blocking ads wholesale is a terrible idea and unnecessary. What needs to be blocked is ads that execute client-side javascript (consuming your memory and cpu), ads that consume too much network bandwidth and so on. Ads are necessary so that content producers can generate income, without it they won't produce quality content. When you block abusive ads (as opposed to all ads), advertisers are encouraged to make their ads less abusive. Content producers get paid and you get to enjoy the content for free. Everyone wins.
hosteur today at 3:01 PM
Why did it take so long?
duxup today at 5:53 PM
> It may not yet be available to all users.

Not me, bummer.

rrgok today at 2:07 PM
It this still only DNS blocking or does cosmetic blocking too?
ImJamal today at 1:27 PM
> Firefox does not block:

> Ads shown on search engine results pages, including Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and other search providers

> Sponsored content on the Firefox Home or New Tab page

So block ads unless it impacts their revenue sources.

jamesforestwest today at 2:34 PM
Well, not bad. But it's not uBlock, and Safari's blocker is already working fine for me. Brave's also been doing this for years. But at least it's something.
owebmaster today at 4:04 PM
What I need is a better PWA installer
iririririr today at 6:24 PM
good time to remember firefox mobile (specially ios) does not have reproducible builds!

on android, f-doid fennec and all other forks do! it's not even hard, so in my view this "is a feature" for mozilla.

then, further remember one person from the board was involved in AdBlock extension who charged firms 1mi to "whitelist good ads". my emoloyer at the time paid under a nda.

still better than nothing (and who am i kidding? 99% here chose to use chrome on their main machine)

righthand today at 4:11 PM
Unrelated but:

Firefox on iOS has a terrible problem with its autocomplete (I think they replaced the algo with a janky Llm-style autocomplete). When I type “news” into the url bar, it will suggest one of it’s marketing partners (or whatever) but incorrectly such as: newsyorker.com

I dont ever visit The New Yorker but even after clearing caches and site data the problem still persists. I can delete the app and the problem goes away for a short while.

I left a review on the App Store about this and the person (bot?) they hire to respond to reviews asks me to open a ticket. No! How about you port my review over as a ticket and fix your damn software.

shevy-java today at 4:09 PM
That may give firefox a bit of percentage back, since some folks can not stand ads anymore. Google garnered a lot of opposition to its evil rule by destroying ublock origin (on chrome).
simoltos today at 5:58 PM
I'm anxious to try it
ramijames today at 2:57 PM
If you haven't been using Firefox, what are you even doing with your life?
TaskForceAgent today at 4:28 PM
[dead]
hnc99rxjlw today at 4:18 PM
[dead]