Continuous Diffusion Language Models (CDLM's)
72 points - yesterday at 8:46 PM
SourceComments
I disagree with this. Decoders were absolutely dominant in 2020 for chat. GPT2 was considered too dangerous to release, and I remember scrambling to get on the GPT3 waitlist. It worked.
(The only exception I will make is encoder-decoder models which now are often done by decoder-only.)
But what made it go mainstream was RL. RLHF at first, then other improvements like DPO that were less of a pain in the ass to set up. Adding diffusion on top of that would be an even bigger pain in the ass.
Before ChatGPT there really wasnât much of a concept of pre-training and post-training. It was all pre-training. Post training was what made the bots conversational and not just âcontinuing the thing you wrote to themâ.
So in short, diffusion never took off because it was just a more complicated way to generate tokens, and the real problem was getting tokens in the right distribution.
Right now models need to rely on less legible compressed CoT to get high intelligence per token/step, but with diffusion they would just need to output more tokens per step instead.