Twelve years of distributed SQLite

169 points - today at 1:16 AM

Source

Comments

piterrro today at 5:48 AM
Having used D1 in production - it's not very reliable. There was a comment on HN from one of D1 devs [1] saying that D1 is a sql wrapper on top of durable objects that mimicks sqlite distributed like nature.

> I'll let you in on a sort of dirty secret: It's almost always better to use Durable Objects storage, rather than D1. Even if you only want a single global database, it's better to implement that as a singleton Durable Object, than by using D1. Because that's all D1 itself actually is: a singleton Durable Object that exposes an API to its SQLite database. It's just a wrapper.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611834

Kinrany today at 5:50 AM
Is there a project that does all of these together?

- embeddable like sqlite

- clustered like dqlite

- has a standalone node like rqlite

- can be backed up to S3 like litesteeam

- optionally AP like cr-sqlite alongside CP

brooksbp today at 5:09 AM
Was a fun read until the end where the author made damn sure that history records who drew the blueprint.
bfren today at 6:47 AM
I maintain one of the client libraries for rqlite - I’ve found it an excellent concept really well implemented. One of my favourite bits is it gives you back json making Dapper-like mapping super easy in .NET and I suspect other languages.
joostdecock today at 7:28 AM
We use rqlite in production, it's the database we chose for (the control plane of) an open source observability solution we're building (morio.it).

Just came here to say two things:

- rqlite is amazing and warmly recommend - Philip is an exceptionally dedicated, kind, and helpful maintainer

5 stars, no notes. Thank you Philip, I'm eternally grateful for all your great work.

chasil today at 4:08 AM
I have never examined this in any detail before. It looks far easier than the mass majority of clustered database architectures.

https://rqlite.io/

tra3 today at 4:33 AM
I know that latest rails suggests SQLite as one of the production options. I don’t get how it’d work with concurrent access though. Time to look into it.
esafak today at 3:17 AM
Very timely for me. I run dqlite in a small cluster and I'm looking to move off it to something more robust. What's recommended in this regime?
feverzsj today at 4:26 AM
There is also hctree from sqlite.
a3nz3g today at 4:03 AM
Like the idea of distributed SQLite, but do we have benchmark? What use cases it has advantage?
deleted today at 3:11 AM
ravivarmat today at 7:38 AM
[flagged]
latencyharbor today at 5:24 AM
[flagged]