TextEdit vs. Pages
34 points - last Tuesday at 3:00 PM
SourceComments
steve1977 today at 11:19 AM
TextEdit has its roots in OPENSTEP, where it was used as kind of a demo application of the text views IIRC. It even came with source code, as did Chess by the way.
So I guess a comparison between TextEdit and Pages doesn't make too much sense probably, they're really different things.
gampleman today at 10:09 AM
Also Pages also has a fairly decent print design mode. Sure, it can't compete with something like Indesign in feature parity, but I find it pretty useful to do posters, booklets, flyers and the like. It's free and fairly intuitive to use.
ch_sm today at 10:32 AM
Pages is an underrated Word Processor. It has the lessons of 30 years of development and experimentation of WYSIWYG editors distilled and applied in a tight little package.
phil-pickering today at 11:43 AM
You should be able to create and use templates for TextEdit using the Stationery Pad feature which comes built-in to macOS:
https://support.apple.com/en-ie/guide/mac-help/mchlp1341/mac
josephwegner today at 12:24 PM
I’ve been a TextEdit-only user for years. I write notes as quick streams of consciousness for me to pick up later. TextEdit is great, but I have similar qualms as the author, and I also have been wanting something that allowed me to build some programmatic tooling around the short notes I write (ie: format these and move them to my Todo list). I’ve been working on a very simple app that is rock solid like TextEdit, but with some niceties for using it as a notes app, instead of a rich text editor.
Feedback appreciated! https://jort.app/
deleted today at 1:01 PM
carlos-cute last Tuesday at 3:13 PM
[flagged]
esFran today at 11:13 AM
Give me KDE Kate, or give me death!