Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long?

79 points - today at 2:58 PM


Ubuntu has CVE-2026-98432 marked as a 9.8, but yet it's coming up on a week with no update to fix it. It's still marked as "work in progress" (though at least now they've listed a mitigation):

https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-98432

I've had mitigations in place for a week, but this response is really shaking my confidence in Ubuntu. I'm just trying to understand what is going on with Ubuntu. Do they have too many kernels (that page is loooong), do they not have enough automation in the build/test pipeline, are their engineers overwhelmed?

We are moving into a world where there are going to be vastly more security issues; if you can't keep up now, where are you going to be in the next 6 months?

For a long time keeping on top of OS updates has been a huge part of keeping the attackers at bay. However, the world is changing.

Comments

AnotherGoodName today at 3:39 PM
It's Canonical. The company that literally asks for high school grades and a multi-page essay on any job application and will pass if you're not in the 99th percentile of year 9 maths even while requiring many years experience (which means you probably don't even know what your year 9 maths scores were). All the while they pay a fraction of any other Bay Area tech company.

What i just described isn't a joke or an exaggeration either. It's literally part of the application process and you can look this up.

Anyway they are quite simply hopelessly mismanaged and no one should be touching Canonical products at this point.

throw0101c today at 4:22 PM
As outlined in this weblog post:

* https://ubuntu.com/blog/fixes-available-in-proposed-pocket-f...

The fixes were in the "proposed" repo since October 26 (noble) and 28 (resolute):

* https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux

One could pull them down at any point in the last week. Yesterday afternoon they were still in "proposed", but I checked this morning (EST/UTC-5) and they there were in "updates". Some tracking of timeline of when the updates to the repos happened seems to be available at:

* https://ma.ttias.be/linux-cve-2026-98432-vulnerable-kernels/

The kernels goes through an QA testing processes, and per this September post, they're looking at shortening the timeframe for kernel updates:

* https://canonical.com/blog/accelerating-delivery-of-cve-fixe...

bon0r today at 4:19 PM
chrisvalleybay today at 3:54 PM
There has been a workaround available since nov 2: https://ubuntu.com/blog/fixes-available-in-proposed-pocket-f...
adsfasf today at 3:26 PM
Aren't the patches out since a day?
ravenstine today at 4:33 PM
I was asking "what in the world is taking Ubuntu so long" back in 2006.
ChrisArchitect today at 4:10 PM
infamouscow today at 3:44 PM
This is a problem with LTS distro kernels in general. You're trading the feeling of stability at the kernel level for security updates.
levkk today at 4:41 PM
[dead]
sick_of_slop today at 3:27 PM
[dead]